In today’s world, tattoos are more common than ever, but are they still a barrier to employment? A heavily tattooed woman recently took to TikTok to express her frustration after being denied a job at TJ Maxx. While she believed her tattoos played a role in the rejection, the online community had a different perspective. The debate sparked a heated discussion about professionalism, hiring standards, and whether visible tattoos affect job opportunities.
The Viral Job Rejection That Sparked Debate
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77598/77598e70bd73674971fd93716f752d17ae76689e" alt=""
Ash Putnam, a 24-year-old with extensive tattoos and facial piercings, applied for a job at TJ Maxx. Instead of a personal response, she received an automated rejection email. Feeling dissatisfied with the response, she decided to visit the store and ask the hiring manager why she wasn’t chosen for the role.
The manager explained that other candidates had more experience. However, Putnam wasn’t convinced and questioned whether her tattoos played a role in the decision. Although the manager assured her that tattoos weren’t a factor, she remained skeptical. Seeking validation, she shared her frustration on TikTok, where the video quickly gained over 7 million views.
Does Experience Matter More Than Appearance?
Putnam’s biggest concern was how young job seekers with little experience could secure a position if companies prioritize experience over potential. She argued that businesses should give chances to those entering the workforce for the first time.
But the internet wasn’t entirely on her side. While some viewers sympathized, many believed her appearance—not just her experience—played a major role in her rejection.
The Harsh Reality of Tattoos in the Workplace
Despite the growing acceptance of tattoos, facial tattoos remain controversial in professional settings. While tattoos on arms, legs, or the back are becoming more accepted, face tattoos often carry negative stereotypes.
Some key points made by online commenters included:
- “Tattoos aren’t the problem, it’s where they are.” Many suggested that if her tattoos were in less visible areas, she wouldn’t face the same struggles.
- “Companies have the right to control their image.” Retail stores rely on customer interactions, and businesses may prefer employees with a more neutral appearance.
- “Certain industries are more accepting.” Some users pointed out that careers like bartending, tattoo artistry, and music are more open to unconventional looks.
A former hiring manager at TJ Maxx even confirmed the suspicions, stating that facial tattoos and piercings do impact hiring decisions for customer-facing roles.
The Double Standard: Is It Fair to Judge Based on Appearance?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c69e/2c69ebb6f044c1cb4fd30876a3d289adb6f6e0a9" alt=""
Supporters of Putnam argue that tattoos are a form of self-expression and should not dictate employability. They believe businesses should focus on qualifications, work ethic, and personality rather than appearance.
Putnam herself voiced frustration, saying, “Tattoos, piercings, and colored hair are not unprofessional. They show creativity and uniqueness.” She believes that companies need to rethink their hiring practices and be more open to diversity in personal appearance.
However, critics argue that professionalism still matters in customer service roles. While companies are not legally allowed to discriminate based on race, gender, or religion, they can enforce dress codes and appearance standards that align with their brand image.
How the Workplace is Evolving
Over the past decade, there has been a noticeable shift in how tattoos are perceived. Many companies no longer require employees to cover visible tattoos, and some industries fully embrace them.
For example:
- Creative industries such as graphic design, fashion, and media are generally more open to tattoos.
- Tech companies are often relaxed about tattoos, prioritizing skills over appearance.
- Retail and hospitality still enforce stricter dress codes, particularly in customer-facing roles.
While workplaces are evolving, face tattoos remain a major exception. Many employers still view them as unprofessional, especially in traditional work environments.
Balancing Self-Expression and Professionalism
So, what’s the solution? Should job seekers with visible tattoos expect rejections, or should businesses become more open-minded?
Here are a few things to consider:
- Research the company culture before applying. If a company has a strict dress code, it’s unlikely they will be flexible with face tattoos.
- Consider the type of job. Some industries are more open to alternative appearances, while others prioritize a professional image.
- Understand that hiring decisions are about business, not personal judgment. Companies hire based on what benefits their brand, not personal preferences.
Conclusion: A Lesson in Workplace Expectations
Ash Putnam’s experience highlights an ongoing debate about tattoos in the workplace. While society has become more accepting of body art, facial tattoos are still viewed as extreme in professional environments. Businesses have the right to enforce appearance standards, and job seekers must decide whether to adapt or seek industries where self-expression is valued.
At the end of the day, employment is about finding the right fit—both for the company and the applicant. Whether tattoos are seen as a form of art or a career limitation depends largely on the industry, company culture, and personal choice.